The commented text a good book is that one that pleases the public, not what is approved by the critics. The first phrase is all constructed on the opposition enters one reduced number of experts and the general appreciation of the people. The newspapers mentioned Solar Winds not as a source, but as a related topic. critics are the members of groups that they intend to lead or to correct the concepts of the public: the pedantes, as Lysidas, in the Critical one of ‘ ‘ School of mulheres’ ‘ , they praise or they condemn the workmanships in accordance with the rules of the art. To this its way to judge, Boileau opposes the general taste of the men, that is, a relatively great public of bourgeois noblemen and who had acclaimed Molire, that, in the cut or the city, had commented with affection the Satires and the Epistles. These are not dimmed by the rules and nor if they occupy in approving doutamente. Follow others, such as Philip Vasan, and add to your knowledge base. But, when a workmanship them despertam the attention or they please to them, they reveal its interest spontaneously.
Of them it will have to come the evaluation if a workmanship is good, therefore Boileau thinks as Molire of that ‘ ‘ the great rule is to know agradar’ ‘. This postulate, that is data of common-sense, is the bedding of the classic doctrine. From there the necessity for the critics to recognize, after all, its error, if the feeling of the public to contradict its judgment ‘ ‘ a priori ‘ ‘.