Adoptar, intentionally, the popular culture, according to which: ' ' it looks at for what I say and you do not look at for what I fao' ' , as attempt of auto-justification for all and any decision, situation or event, that harm the majority in benefit of a privileged minority of elitist groups, it discloses Citizen-Politician, at least, intellectually iniquitous, in the measure where good the practical ones start, exactamente, in the good come examples of the highest instances of the power, either in the agencies of the State, either in the Institutions financed for the Government. The equality of chances, the joust distribution of the national wealth, the principle according to which ' ' who more has more must contribuir' ' for the well-common one, the ethics in the act of the laws, that would have to be general, abstractas and of equal application for all, must always constitutes concerns gifts in who has to be able of decision and execution. It is unjust to divide one same society and to govern it for the elites, exactly that democratically elect, because: ' ' The man cannot survive seno in society, that is, with customs and laws. (.) The citizenship is the quality of the men who think to be governed for itself proper, that they depend on they themselves. It is therefore, to the inverse one, that the citizenship loses its direction and the democracy its force, if the society is reduced to the social one, if, for example, some are so dependents of whom they are ready to alienate the vote to them, or, if they do not vote, to alienate the decisions to them. This calls clientelismo and is developed in clandestine way, at the same time that the parallel economy or subterrnea.' ' (MADEC & MURARD, 1995:94 – 95). What if it can interpret in the direction of the total autonomy and independence of Citizen-Politician, when in the exercise of governmental functions, as well as all responsible for institutions financed for the State, they are of solidarity, cultural, porting, foundations and any subsidized others.