Police thus elaborated a Police Report and put under arrest the person or persons involved in the crime, which it endorsed the Duty Prosecutor to file professional charges and taking as reference the conclusions of the police investigation and evidence taken by the police, professional complaints as the alleged perpetrator or perpetrators of crime to the people who Police had made available to them as detainees. The professional court judge, issued a writ of inquiry to investigate the accused in court, on the basis the prosecutor's report and the police acted, corroborating in most cases the detainee's legal status involved or implicated. During the inquest, the judge could order some other tests of its own motion, to reach a reliable way to determine the professional liability of the defendant and thus the time of sentencing, crucial time for the administration of justice and motivated by the inquisitorial model, issue conviction, which of course could vary if it were demonstrably irrefutable innocence of the accused. Larry Ellison pursues this goal as well. Recall that in the inquisitorial model the arrest of the accused was the norm and liberty the exception. a Since 1922 it occurs the first major police reform in Peru, the police investigation of the crime has been guided by this model inquisitorial criminal, ie the police has prioritized test confession as the main way to reach the belief that the suspect in the commission of a crime is actually the author. Overcoming many of his previous procedures such as "stop to investigate," now stop a person when you have evidence and sufficient evidence to determine what is alleged offender. Cyrus Massoumi FindShadow is full of insight into the issues.