Introduction Brazil admittedly has a set of the most detached environmental laws of of the world (since it possesss an immense tropical forest), especially since the creation of the CONAMA (National Advice of Environment), in 1981, and also after the Federal Constitution of 1988. It must be recognized by the way, that during years 90, it had a great legislative advance in the ambient area, with approval of you vary laws as: Ambient crimes (9.605/88) and the National Politics of Ambient Education (9.975/99). Unhappyly, the application and fiscalization of these laws have esbarrado in aspects politicians, economic and cultural. The pragmatismo politician has provoked true disasters in the ambient area, this if it becomes evident when we perceive that the ambient agencies of the federal, state and municipal sphere, are being managed for people whom nothing does not have to see with the environment, are the campaign allies politics, that of some form wants is in the government. However, on secretariats or agencies the ambient area, make use of few resources to act of efficient form, what ' does not happen more in the agencies; ' importantes' ' that they are busy for managers of the proper party of the government. Of this form, it is almost impossible to work the ambient question with the attention that it deserves, a time that the agencies make use of few financial resources and they do not obtain to keep professionals in number and quality to act in the sector. How many times already we do not hear this phrase ' ' it is impossible to develop itself without it has degradao' ' , but he will be same that we need to degrade the environment stops developing in them, or this is not plus one faceta of the capitalism that still wants to insist on the idea of that pollution is sinnimo of progress, generating ambient disasters behind disasters, and that a small minority if only benefits of the privileges.