Month: September 2012
Of the side of inside it put 500 high, strong men and endowed with firearms well, prontificados to assure the peace. Of the side of it are, others 500 men farejadores walked behind that they did not answer with the due respect to the orders of Brazil farmer. But they were as much, and some did not leave tracks, that the battalion did not give account. More 500 contracted and Brazil thought that the problem would finish. Now, with a thousand men the service of the order, ‘ ‘ Its Brasil’ ‘ it did not have more with what if to worry, after all, its competent employees had imprisoned almost all the transgressors of the farm. Already more it did not have reasons to forbid ‘ ‘ all seus’ ‘ to enjoy the flavor of the freedom.
But, others ‘ ‘ millions of diabinhos’ ‘ still they were ready pra to hammer the head of the Brazil poor person. The bothering lode when it less waited. Its surrounds, assaz insurance, was completely overloaded for beings that, to the times, ‘ ‘ lembravam’ ‘ human beings. The dissatisfaction was growing gradually, next to the rebellions, that later would come if to become violent. Its children had been rigorously forbidden to walk in the periphery of the surrounded one. The descendants, enraivados, had also shown, despite of alegrica form, its dissatisfactions. In fact, ‘ ‘ Its Brasil’ ‘ ‘ was in one; ‘ sinuca of bico’ ‘. Of the other side of the farm a well woody place exists, to the side of a clear water dam, that is perfect to botar in practical my plan, alleged Brazil. It ordered to knock down more 1000 trees, it bought more 7 trucks of barbed wire and contracted more 500 men to make the internal security of the new granary. The son oldest of Brazil closed the portire, later that all its brothers already were inside.
And it is that the posmodernidad inaugurated a series of rights based on the priority of I. That I to hper consumer of desires, satisfactions and hedonismos individualistic, other people’s to the consequences that they generate, has exempted to us of our behavioural responsibility. The things happen, happen and occur without no subject assumes responsibilities. The events and the actions are placed in the limb, without burden some. And it is that the vital experience lacks lessons already because the own reality is desdramatizada. Because hper individualisation has fagocitado all critical and political reading of the reality and the subjects remains other people’s to the commitments. But also the State, the Government, the public institutions and administrations have stayed out of any responsibility transferring it to the individual hired and armored by the rights of consumer I.
The 150 thousand victims by firearms in the last ten years in Venezuela are not responsibility of anybody. She does not have people in charge because nobody becomes position of the drama of all those families, who in the end also are victims of an uncontrollable and indetenible citizen insecurity. The social malaise is reflected in the system of the social, public and deprived services, that victimizan the personal pathologies making believe to the subject that is the culprit of its situation. Unemployments of long intensity, labor uncertainty, the social exclusion, the endemic poverty, the increase of the divorces, pathological stress, and the anxiety that becomes a new gnoseolgica category, that explains the new social problems, that absolutely is depoliticized in their analysis and meaning. For example, the Social Services have invented tools of social normativizacin like the B.A.E. (the Active Search of Use) in Spain; the agreements of incorporation and the itinerary of insertion in Italy, like examples of technical-bureaucratic proposals, totally descontextualizadas of the social reality, because the patologizados and deprived of authority subjects are forced to come off itself their protagonism historical to be inserted like instrument of a program reduces that it to a statistical figure.
Adoptar, intentionally, the popular culture, according to which: ' ' it looks at for what I say and you do not look at for what I fao' ' , as attempt of auto-justification for all and any decision, situation or event, that harm the majority in benefit of a privileged minority of elitist groups, it discloses Citizen-Politician, at least, intellectually iniquitous, in the measure where good the practical ones start, exactamente, in the good come examples of the highest instances of the power, either in the agencies of the State, either in the Institutions financed for the Government. The equality of chances, the joust distribution of the national wealth, the principle according to which ' ' who more has more must contribuir' ' for the well-common one, the ethics in the act of the laws, that would have to be general, abstractas and of equal application for all, must always constitutes concerns gifts in who has to be able of decision and execution. It is unjust to divide one same society and to govern it for the elites, exactly that democratically elect, because: ' ' The man cannot survive seno in society, that is, with customs and laws. (.) The citizenship is the quality of the men who think to be governed for itself proper, that they depend on they themselves. It is therefore, to the inverse one, that the citizenship loses its direction and the democracy its force, if the society is reduced to the social one, if, for example, some are so dependents of whom they are ready to alienate the vote to them, or, if they do not vote, to alienate the decisions to them. This calls clientelismo and is developed in clandestine way, at the same time that the parallel economy or subterrnea.' ' (MADEC & MURARD, 1995:94 – 95). What if it can interpret in the direction of the total autonomy and independence of Citizen-Politician, when in the exercise of governmental functions, as well as all responsible for institutions financed for the State, they are of solidarity, cultural, porting, foundations and any subsidized others.